City officials are considering a center-running bus lane for Blue Hill Avenue.
The redesign of Blue Hill Avenue will apply to the stretch between Seaver Street and Mattapan Square.
City weighing traffic calming, center bus lanes
City officials say they are moving forward with plans for an ambitious redesign of one of the city’s, and the Commonwealth’s, most persistently dangerous roadways: the three-mile stretch of Blue Hill Avenue connecting Mattapan to Dorchester’s Grove Hall.
The project, dubbed the Blue Hill Avenue Transportation Action Plan, represents the corridor’s first significant overhaul in some 70 years, when the avenue was stripped of its commuter streetcar lines and given over entirely to vehicular traffic.
Citing myriad issues, including perpetual gridlock, air pollution, high crash rates, unsafe crosswalks and sluggish bus service, many residents, civic groups and
See BLUE HILL AVE., page 6
Blue Hill Ave.
continued from page 1
advocacy
organizations say change is long overdue. But the effort, still in
development, has already provoked backlash. The backlash is coming
especially from drivers who have shown up in numbers to recent public
meetings to urge against any reduction of traffic lanes — such as might
accompany potential plans for center bus lanes. (The corridor carries
three major city bus routes.)
City
officials emphasize that no final design has been developed yet, and
that a robust public input process is ongoing and will continue into
next year — but they are also signaling a willingness to move forward
with an ambitious redesign that prioritizes accessibility, and
especially safety, for all who traverse the corridor — backlash or no.
In
a conversation with the Banner, Chief of Streets Jascha Franklin-Hodge
said the city cannot afford to maintain the status quo when it comes to
the city’s most problematic corridors — like Blue Hill Avenue.
“Unfortunately,
we still have thousands of crashes that happen every year in Boston,
severe enough to require EMS dispatch,” Franklin-Hodge said. “Those
numbers alone are enough to let us know we have not built streets that
are safe enough.”
“What
we hear over and over again in every neighborhood in the city,” he
said, “is that people don’t feel safe … And what we have [with Blue Hill
Avenue] is unfortunately one of the highest-crash corridors in the
city.”
Beyond crash
rates, Franklin-Hodge cites a slew of other concerns, including many of
the ones shared in public meetings and elsewhere by neighborhood
organizations and residents who live along Blue Hill Avenue and who must
contend with the roadway day and night.
Fatima
Ali-Salaam, chair of the Greater Mattapan Neighborhood Council, can
easily rattle off some of the challenges the roadway presents:
double-parked cars, immobilized buses, ill-conceived intersections,
rampant speeding, impossibly daunting crosswalks.
“Some
of those crosswalks are as short as 10 seconds! You’ll see the little
light start blinking and it’s like, ‘Hey, what happened?!’” notes
Ali-Salaam.
At
the heart of all those problems, Ali-Salaam says, is a reality that
will require more than tweaks to the roadway — Blue Hill Avenue has
become a de facto urban highway, an artery carrying huge volumes of
traffic through the neighborhoods it traverses.
“We
have seven major corridors that go through Mattapan,” says Ali-Salaam.
“When we say the traffic comes through, it really does.”
And
she notes, “Most of the traffic going down Blue Hill does not originate
within the city,” but from outlying suburbs to the south.
Community process
Ali-Salaam’s
group has not taken an official position on what changes should look
like – and she sympathizes with various anxieties being brought to the
table.
“The one
stipulation we had” in agreeing to be part of the city’s public input
process, she says, “is that whatever the outcome was, it had to go
through a true community process … because long-term, once something is
done, whatever the city and the state come up with, we’re the ones who
end up living with it.”
She
adds, “We want to make sure that it is a space that is not just a
pass-through. You want to make it comfortable for people, [so they] feel
safe crossing the street, feel safe on the sidewalk, feel safe
driving.”
Still,
online public meetings hosted by the city have so far have been
dominated by drivers, who largely express skepticism, if not outright
hostility, to the city’s planning efforts. That skepticism is especially
directed at the controversial possibility — still just that — of
turning over the avenue’s center lanes to bus traffic and effectively
reducing other traffic to one lane for the three-mile stretch.
Looming
over that conversation are concerns about other street overhauls,
including new center bus lanes along Columbus Avenue between Egleston
Square and Jackson Square.
City officials say they take concerns seriously, but that the facts don’t always bear out popular conceptions.
Responding
to complaints that center bus lanes had ground traffic to a halt on
Columbus Avenue, for example, Kirstie Hostetter, the city’s project
manager for the Blue Hill Avenue plan, noted that while those changes
had slowed traffic, before the project was implemented, people were
driving 45 miles per hour on Columbus Avenue.
“Now,”
she said, “you can go only as fast as the slowest car, which can be
frustrating, but it means that people are driving at a much safer speed,
down to 35 miles per hour being the maximum speed people are driving.”
And while that’s still faster than the city’s 25 mph speed limit, the
relative slow-down, she said, means “people are much less likely to die
if they are hit.”
In
surveys, users of Columbus Avenue felt safer crossing the street and
accessing buses and reported faster and more reliable bus service along
the corridor after those improvements, Hostetter said.
Hostetter
and other city officials acknowledged that the execution of those
changes was not perfect: In a recent public meeting, Hostetter noted
concerns by nearby residents that traffic-calming measures along
Columbus Avenue increased traffic and speeding along side streets. She
said city officials are determined to address such concerns up front
when it comes to the Blue Hill Avenue plan.
The
city will continue conducting surveys and studies and soliciting public
opinion through next year, with monthly public meetings scheduled
through the summer of 2023 and semi-regular meetings continuing
thereafter as the city finalizes plans. Bidding and construction are
scheduled to begin in summer 2024.
Holmes voices support
State Rep. Russell Holmes, who represents the area, says that communication and clarity are key to a successful outcome.
“I’ve been giving [city officials] quite a lot of advice,” Holmes told the Banner. “One, lead with the facts.”
Holmes
strongly supports the overhaul, saying safety for all users is
paramount. Nonetheless, he acknowledges that the city will face
opposition to change, some of it implacable.
There
are people “who are going to probably say ‘no’ in the end, no matter
what,” Holmes said. “They’re going to do everything they can to say,
‘This is horrible.’ But if you’re listening intently, they’ll bring to
you the things you really should be considering. And you should take
that advice and make sure you go and incorporate that into the design. …
When folks push hard and bring you a legitimate concern, address it.”
But equally important is that the city “lead with political courage,” he said.
“The
things that really impact people, large amounts of people, are going to
be hard,” he said, “because change is hard. And so you’re going to need
to have the political will and fortitude to do what’s right, not what
is easy.”
“Things that are hard are a lot of the things I want to do most,” Holmes added. “And that’s why I love this project.”