Investigations consider accounts of 15 women. Jay Kesan remains on paid leave.
A University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign law professor has been found in violation of the
university’s sexual misconduct policy. That’s according to internal
investigative reports from late last year, obtained by Illinois Times through a public records request.
The
law firm hired by the university to investigate new claims against Jay
Kesan from 15 women suggests that “significant employment action be
taken” against the tenured professor.
A
former student lodged a complaint against Kesan with the university in
November 2018, a month after prior sexual harassment allegations became
public.
After
receiving new investigative findings from the Office for Access and
Equity, the dean of the College of Law recommended in February that the
university pursue “serious sanctions, up to and including dismissal.”
Kesan disputed the findings in a statement to Illinois Times. He wrote that the report “makes no attempt to be fair or neutral.”
According
to a university spokesperson, Kesan has not been allowed at the College
of Law for over a year and is on paid administrative leave. His last
reported salary was $238,183.21.
In
a statement, the university said the matter is under review and
stressed it aims to provide a safe environment for students, faculty and
staff.
The initial investigation
The
university faced criticism over its handling of the initial complaints
against Kesan. Reform efforts followed, including the formation of a
UIUC committee on faculty sexual misconduct.
At
a #MeToo forum in October 2018 at the College of Law, Kathy Lee, an
Urbana resident with friends in the law school, asked what was being
done to protect students from Kesan’s behavior, which was the first time
allegations were publicized.
A
university report was subsequently uncovered by media that detailed
allegations from three women of harassment. A letter noting claims of
unwanted sexual behavior was also uncovered, dating back to 2002.
In 2017, the university told Kesan to undergo training and that he had to miss out on pay-bumps for a period of time.
A
university finding of sexual misconduct likely would have come with
more severe sanctions, but his behavior – including unwelcome touching,
inappropriate sexualized comments and “ogling” – was not at the time
deemed “severe or pervasive” enough to qualify as sexual misconduct.
After
calls for his resignation, Kesan wrote a letter to the law school
community admitting to and apologizing for the conduct described by
victims. He stated he would take a voluntary unpaid leave for calendar
year 2019.
Kesan had
been scheduled to return to teach in January 2020. However, weeks before
then, it was announced he would instead be placed on
“university-sanctioned leave.”
New claims against Kesan
The most recent investigations include details from “as many as 14 different people” over a period “as long as 15 years.”
There
are two reports. One involves claims from a former student detailing “a
series of actions in 2014 of a sexual or gender-based nature,”
including prying into her personal life, repeatedly urging her to meet
with him privately, and running his fingers on her bare skin “from about
two inches above (her) knee, to very close to her hip” while parked in a
car.
According to
that report, Kesan said he did not recall the incident. The investigator
said the touching bordered on sexual assault. Kesan was found in
violation of both the sexual misconduct policy and code of conduct as a
result of the woman’s claims.
The
reports, authored by attorney Peter Land of law firm Husch Blackwell,
state that while on leave in 2019, Kesan underwent counseling and
learned that he “needs to be more cognizant of how he is perceived.”
Kesan
testifed he often gets close to people when speaking as he is hard of
hearing. When asked why complaints were coming from women as opposed to
men, Kesan answered, “It could be that the problem is me.”
Land
found Kesan also violated the sexual harassment policy in one other
instance, per the account of former student Jessica Lanford.
Lanford,
who was also a witness in the initial investigation, said she was
approached by the university’s Title IX office in March of 2019 to again
give testimony. She said she was wary of the issue once more coming
into her orbit, as the initial outcome was disappointing.
“I
had the first time around really felt that I was doing the right thing
by sharing what had happened to me, that I could trust the officials at
the university to do the right thing with information that I was
sharing,” she said.
Throughout
the past year, she remained hopeful that this time the university would
“get it right,” that is, find Kesan in violation of policies and issue
serious sanctions.
Kesan wrote to Illinois Times that Lanford’s claims had already been part of a previous investigation and questioned why a new decision was reached.
The
initial investigation into Kesan took more than two years. The latest
effort took more than six months. University policy says investigations
should be completed within 60 days when possible.
Reform efforts
In the midst
of the #MeToo movement, universities across the country have been
grappling with how tenure protections and other factors unique to higher
education – like heightened power differentials – can enable bad
behavior. Kesan’s situation has drawn national attention as some argue
it exemplifies gaps in current policies.
UIUC
law professor Robin Kar headed the committee tasked with researching
best practices and suggesting ways to change the university’s
investigative and disciplinary processes for faculty.
It
found complaints about the time investigations took were widespread.
“We concluded that the expeditiousness of these processes was something
we needed to improve,” said Kar.
The
committee also suggested the sexual harassment policy broaden what it
considered qualifying behavior, and that the university hire more
confidential advisers to work directly with victims.
Last
year, an investigation by NPR Illinois and ProPublica found that UIUC
faculty who had violated university sexual harassment policy in recent
years had their reputations protected.
Some were put on paid leave for months.
Some
signed nondisclosure agreements with the university, in which the
university promised to keep the details of their departures secret
unless required by law.
It’s not only victims who have a close eye on what policy changes the university needs.
One
is Kathy Lee, whose friends formalized complaints with the university
years ago. “The reason they came forward was because they want to see
change for people in the future,”Lee said. “And they did not feel that
anything had changed for the future.”
Those friends include Lanford. Having reviewed the new investigative report provided to her by Illinois Times, she said, “I absolutely agree with the findings, but I’m concerned that procedurally there’s continued confusion.”
Contact Rachel Otwell at rotwell@illinoistimes.com. Mary Hansen of NPR Illinois contributed to this report.
If
you have been a target of sexual harassment or assault, you can reach a
person trained to help at the National Sexual Assault Hotline:
800-656-HOPE (4673) or online.rainn.org.