Citizens Club president offers ideas for progress
“As goes the leadership of the top 100 cities, so goes the country’s economic future,” suggests Jim Clifton, Gallop CEO, in The Coming JOBS War. “Fixing America’s biggest problems and re-winning the world can only be accomplished one city at a time. A natural order is already present... cities have a selforganized, unelected group of talented people . . . call them local ‘tribal leaders.’” Springfield may not quite be one of the top 100 cities, but we have hundreds of “tribal leaders” dedicated to improving Springfield, and they have larger networks and more access to other talented people than the local government does.
The new mayor and city council inherit a variety of challenges, actually serious problems, and will have to deal with most of them almost immediately. Effectively harnessing the energy and expertise of the many talented Springfield citizens is critical to the city’s success.
The management structure of CWLP certainly needs attention. The new mayor and city council should appoint a blue ribbon group of local citizens to assist in selecting a new utility manager, and also to provide some insight and direction on how other municipal utilities are managed. The effort should morph into a Citizens Utility Advisory Committee or even a quasi-independent Citizens Utility Board.
The regional sanitary district, one of the best in the country, and the city sewer service, slightly above third world, should be merged. While certainly a long-range effort, the county and city should establish a formal task group of experts and citizens to begin this important discussion.
Pretty much every significant city in the state has a city planner, but only one other city, Chicago, has an inspector general. If a city planner is to be established, however, there needs to be an intelligent and public conversation concerning the role of the position, and if the city would even follow a plan if there was one. The Springfield “shredgate” episode actually gives support to the proposal for a city inspector general. When unauthorized city employees changed a formal contractual agreement (signed by citizens’ elected representatives) and others shredded formally requested public documents, the U.S. attorney and state’s
attorney showed little interest, the state police conducted their normal
lengthy and incompetent investigation, and an entity no one ever heard
of presented a one-page report on the eve of an election that said “no
blood, no foul.” Certainly a city inspector general could have done no
worse.
Leadership and
commitment by the new mayor and city council is needed in many areas,
but a focus on downtown is clearly important. There is convincing data
that 500-1,000 downtown housing units would be filled if they were
built. That would totally change the nature of downtown and the city for
the better.
The
normal response to suggestions that we could do a lot better in areas
like tourism, the medical district, eastside development, beautifying
streets, etc., is always lack of financial resources. The new mayor and
city council should seriously look at all city expenditures, but
especially the amount of money supporting the police department and the
fire department. A small group of law enforcement experts and citizens
should be convened for a few months to compare the number of police
officers and budgets of several peer cities and Springfield. The 2008
Blue Ribbon Committee report, and more recent data, suggests that
Springfield has 30- 40 more police officers than other communities of
similar size.
Comparisons
are more complex and difficult for fire departments, but this would be
an excellent time for an in-depth look at how the city handles fire
protection and emergency/medical response. Our highly regarded fire
department is now an obscenely expensive emergency/medical response
group. It is critical that a group of citizens, along with appropriate
experts, be asked to look at the current structure of the Springfield
Fire Department and the budgetary demands. With emergency/medical calls
about 95 percent of all calls, perhaps a review of how other communities
are coping with this changing situation would be in order.
Committees
and task groups are no substitute for strong and capable leadership by
the mayor and city council, but they are indispensable in creating
honest and transparent local government that thrives on local citizen
involvement.
A city prospers simply by taking entrepreneurship, innovation and citizen involvement up a notch.
When
local political leadership and local tribal leaders are aligned and
focused, a city can become a beacon for development and will attract the
most talented people in the world.
Actually, the future of Springfield demands it.
Bob
Gray is president of the Citizens Club of Springfield. This article was
sent to Citizens Club members las week under the heading “President’s
Comments.”