Stuck in Illinois . . .

DYSPEPSIANA | James Krohe Jr.

I’m packin’ up darlin’, down the road I go …a black top road running to a gravel road then a sand top road and I’ll be gone –“You Don’t have To Go” as performed by Jerry Lee Lewis

The pollsters of the Gallup organization asked people around the country whether they would move away from their home states, given the chance. Half of the Illinois residents asked said yes. No state had more residents dreaming of faraway places.

Of course, public opinion polls are to public opinion what marriage vows are to marriages, but the announcement of the Gallup results excited much wringing of hands and I-told-you-so’s from commentators. A few more sober public wise men – Rich Miller for one – dismissed the poll as just people talking, and with reason. After a tax rate increase and a rotten summer followed by a winter you wouldn’t wish on Sarah Palin, asking Illinoisans if they’d like to be somewhere else was like asking someone in the 1970s who’d just been mugged in Central Park what he thinks of life in New York City.

Did Gallup stumble upon some undiscovered social fault that threatens the foundation of the commonwealth? Damned if I know. What I do know is that there have always been Illinoisans who have always yearned to become ex-Illinoisans, and that millions of them have done just that. I was reminded of that recently while reading a study done by historian K.J. Winkler in the 1990s and published in the Journal of Social History. His study of Migration and Political Participation among Springfield voters of the time found that population turnover in mid-Illinois in those days was remarkably high; anyone living in the same town as long as five years qualified as rooted in the community. Indeed, Lincoln’s presidential campaign advisors opted for the Railsplitter theme in part because by the time he was being talked about as a presidential prospect, Lincoln’s backwoods origins were forgotten by the larger public, if they were ever known.

And so it has gone, for 150 years. The unskilled move to where it’s booming, the semiskilled move to where it’s cheap, the old move to where it’s warm, the young move to where it’s fun. According to the IRS, from 1993 to 2011, 438,000 more households moved out of Illinois than moved into it.

Very often it’s good riddance. Diana Sroka Rickert, by day a mouthpiece for the Illinois Policy Institute, reacted to the Gallup findings in a Tribune op-ed. “Indiana has become a destination spot for Illinoisans . . . who still want access to our airports and city, without paying the high prices.” By “high prices,” she means the costs of providing airports and a city worth having access to. Seeing the backs of such freeloaders ought to gladden Illinoisans.

Rickert also introduced us to a pair of newlyweds who are leaving suburban Chicago to start their new life in Texas, because, as the wife put it, “I just don’t see us getting ahead by staying here.” Elected officials are obliged to pay attention to the views of foolish young people who head off to new states, as these people are doing, without jobs, where they know no one, where jobs are likely to pay less than here, who think, in short, they can get ahead without training, without planning, without patience. The rest of us should pay them no mind at all.

This kind of mobility is thought (by economists at least) to be good for America, because talent thus moves to where it can be best used. Mobility also serves as a social safety valve; discontent never rises to explosive levels where people can leave a place and take their unhappiness with them. Even mere chronic disgruntlement of the sort detected by the Gallup poll has soured Illinois politics and weakened the bond – never strong in Illinois to begin with – residents have with the civil community.

Which is why I for one considered the Gallup poll to be good news – if only they would actually leave. Americans, once a famously footloose people, have become stuck in the mud. The percentage of the U.S. population that moved from one state to another was only half as large – 1.5 percent compared to nearly 3 percent – in 1990 as it was in 2011. As America goes – or does not go in this case – so goes Illinois. Of those who told Gallup they were fed up with Illinois, nearly all are just daydreamers with no plans to actually leave. And why don’t they leave? Because they have a house they can’t sell, or kids in school, or aging parents who need tending to, or they’re drawing a seniority-based salary they don’t deserve and couldn’t possibly command if they started over somewhere else. In short, what’s wrong with life in Illinois is life, not Illinois.

Contact James Krohe Jr. at [email protected]

Editor’s note

“This is a complicated topic,” said Sen. Andy Manar, one of the panelists on the May 20 program about “Smart streamlining” – fi nding ways to improve government effi ciency by consolidating and downsizing (see article p. 15). Others on the panel agreed how very complicated it all is. But former Mayor Karen Hasara pointed out that Springfi eld and Sangamon County successfully combined their election commissions, their health departments and parks, all to good results. Evanston residents recently voted to eliminate Evanston Township, which had the same boundaries as the city. Capital Township, which has the same boundaries as Springfi eld, could easily be eliminated the same way. It’s not complicated, just politically diffi cult. And necessary, to save money and restore faith in government. “If you love the Land of Lincoln as much as I do and we all do,” said Andy Shaw, head of the Better Government Association, “we need to restore the glow on the statue outside the Capitol building. We need to restore the image and the functionality of this state, and smart streamlining is one of the ways to do it.” –Fletcher Farrar, editor and publisher