In the wake of Charlottesville, concern about true believers
Before the election of Donald Trump I warned voters of the perils of narcissism among political leaders. I concluded with the following sentence: “Sadly, gullible individuals are especially vulnerable to the extraordinary claims and charm of a charismatic narcissist. Be careful out there.” The events surrounding the Charlottesville tragedy suggest the need for follow-up warnings about gullible individuals, drawn from history and social psychology.
The German political scene during the decades following World War I offers an extreme example of the problems that can emerge in a society when malignant narcissism encounters authoritarian gullibility. Initially a tiny minority of German citizens were attracted to a charismatic leader who promised to restore Germany’s greatness. Some Christian ministers encouraged their congregations to support Adolf Hitler. As the Nazi party gained power, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a Lutheran minister, was distressed to observe that his majority Christian nation was either too complacent or gullible enough to offer enthusiastic support for the monstrous evil that developed. As Hitler came to power in 1933, Bonhoeffer began his efforts to confront his anti-Semitic Christian colleagues. He organized underground seminaries and became involved in the German resistance movement against Hitler and the Third Reich. He was arrested by the Nazis in 1943 and executed in 1945.
During his 10 years working with other religious leaders and the German resistance, Bonhoeffer tried to understand the thinking of German citizens who supported Hitler. While in prison he wrote about the rise of Nazism in terms of what he called a “sociological-psychological law.” Every strong upsurge of political or religious power infects a large part of humankind with gullibility and stupidity. The power of the leader is dependent on the gullibility of the followers. According to Bonhoeffer, the overwhelming impact of rising power can deprive persons of their inner independence. They are willing to give up their autonomy in order to become part of a new authoritarian order.
Do Bonhoeffer’s observations of German citizens during the Nazi era have relevance for our current political circumstances in America? Long before the Charlottesville tragedy, David Brooks, a moderate Republican columnist, explored that question in his column in the New York Times (Feb. 14, 2017). While he suggested that it would be
difficult to imagine America turning into “full fascism,” he did offer
the possibility that authoritarianism could be a threat under the Trump
administration. Charlottesville confirms that possible threat.
The
validity of Bonhoeffer’s sociological-psychological law received
confirmation in a study of cult behavior in the United States. The
classic social psychological treatise, “When Prophecy Fails,” by Leon
Festinger, Henry Riecken and Stanley Schacter, published in 1956,
offered a detailed analysis of what happened to a cult leader and her
followers when her prophecies did not come true. True believers
stubbornly maintained their erroneous beliefs even when faced with
unequivocal, undeniable evidence and direct experience. In fact many
followers became even more zealous in their support of the leader. While
the study focused on religious beliefs and behavior within a small
doomsday cult, the findings may also help us understand the existence of
political beliefs and behavior that may seem irrational or even
dangerous.
In
conversations with gullible German citizens, Bonhoeffer realized that he
was not dealing with real persons, but with slogans and catchwords that
had taken possession of them. “Having thus become a mindless tool, the
gullible person will also be capable of any evil and at the same time
incapable of seeing that it is evil. This is where the danger of
diabolical misuse lurks, for it is this that can once and for all
destroy human beings” (Letters and Papers from Prison, 1953).
According
to David Brooks, “If we are in a Bonhoeffer moment, then aggressive
nonviolent action makes sense: marching in the streets, blocking
traffic, disrupting town halls, vehement rhetoric to mobilize mass
opposition.” Brooks, however, goes on to say that he does not believe
that we are at a “Bonhoeffer moment” and that the Trump administration
will not sustain itself for a full term. He believes that “Republicans
will eventually peel away.”
I
hope he is right. I hope that moderate Republicans will have the
courage to confront the challenge of an out-of-control Trump
administration. In the meantime, I hope progressives, liberals,
Democrats, independents and moderate Republicans will continue to work
to avoid the potential “danger of diabolical misuse” by an authoritarian
regime.
Ronald F.
Ettinger received a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from Purdue University
in 1969 and was awarded a postdoctoral research fellowship in Social
Psychology at York University (Toronto) in 1970. He was awarded the rank
of Professor Emeritus when he retired from University of Illinois
Springfi eld in 2001.