Go down 30 feet, Pawnee says
While Pawnee questions the
design of Hunter Lake, an engineering firm that has worked for the
village questions the need for a 3,000-acre reservoir, which would
stretch to the burg south of Springfield.
Mudflats
and mosquitoes are Pawnee’s “number one environmental issue,” village
attorney John Myers wrote in a Sept. 14 letter to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, which must issue a permit and so solicited public comment on
the proposed lake.
“The
potential for rotting vegetation, odors and insect infestations is
obvious, and will significantly degrade the quality of life in the
village,” Myers wrote.
One
solution, Myers wrote, would involve deepening the southern portion of
the proposed lake so that water would stop well short of the village.
The lake as designed would have an average depth of less than 15 feet,
according to a 16-year-old city plan, half the depth the village says
should be considered at the southern end of the proposed reservoir.
According to Myers, consultants for Springfield and City Water, Light
and Power have considered whether deepening the lake might address
potential problems with phosphate pollution.
“Subject
to the findings of the ongoing (pollution) study, this problem might
well necessitate the southern terminus of the new lake being relocated
to New City Road, approximately four miles north of the village, with
the new lake being dredged to a depth of 30 feet or so at that
location,” Myers wrote.
The
pollution study to which Myers refers is part of an effort to obtain a
permit from the state Environmental Protection Agency, which must be
assured that runoff from surrounding land won’t pollute the lake.
Phosphorus is a particular concern, given that excessive levels can
trigger algae blooms.
Sanjay
Sofa, chief of the Bureau of Water for IEPA, said that he wasn’t
familiar with a proposal to deepen the proposed lake as a means of
alleviating potential problems with phosphorus and algae blooms. There
are many variables, he said, but water depth can play a role, given that
algae tends to grow in warm temperatures that can develop in shallow
depths.
“I think, in general, shallow depths, they’re more prone to algae blooms than deeper water,” Sofa said.
Ted Meckes, CWLP water division manager, said that the city is aware of the issue.
“The design of the lake has not been fully determined, although
digging the entire lake 30 feet deeper would be unrealistic and cost
prohibitive,” Meckes worte in an email.
Pawnee
“fully supports” relocating the lake so that it doesn’t come anywhere
near the village, Myers wrote. The village also suggested widening and
dredging Horse Creek, which would be inundated by Hunter Lake, so that a
pool of water between five and eight feet deep would be created. And
Myers suggested that athletic fields at the school be raised to address
flooding concerns; in the past, CWLP has suggested building a berm
around the fields.
In a
separate letter to the Army Corps of Engineers, which solicited public
input on Springfield’s application for a permit, Greene and Bradford, a
Springfield engineering firm that has worked as a consulting engineer
for Pawnee, said there are better, and cheaper, sources of water for
Springfield than Hunter Lake.
CWLP
officials have talked about a shortfall of 11 million gallons per day.
Considering that the average golf course consumes 300,000 gallons of
water per day, more than three million gallons per day could be saved if
local golf courses used wastewater effluent for watering, according to
the letter from Gary LaForge, a Greene and Bradford engineer.
Beyond
conservation, the city should seek water from larger watersheds than
the one that feeds Lake Springfield and would supply Hunter Lake,
LaForge says in his letter and an interview. The Sangamon River remains
untapped, even though it flows at the rate of 24 million gallons a day
during dry spells; by contrast, less than a half-million gallons flow
through streams that feed Lake Springfield during dry weather, he says.
Similarly, LaForge says the city should consider getting water from Salt
Creek near Lincoln, where 26 million gallons a day flow during dry
conditions.
Horse and Brush creeks, which would feed Hunter Lake, dry up in drought conditions, LaForge says.
“So, the lake that you’re building for a drought condition has no water going into it during a drought,” Laforge said.
Instead
of drilling wells near Havana, which the city has billed as an
alternative to Hunter Lake, the city should drill near Lincoln and tap
into the Mahomet Aquifer, the same underground water supply that would
feed Havana-area wells, LaForge wrote.
But
George Roadcap, a hydrologist with the Illinois State Water Survey at
the University of Illinois, said that the aquifer in the Lincoln area is
covered with clay, so it takes longer to recharge than the aquifer near
Havana, which is close to the ground surface. If Springfield
drew water from wells in the Lincoln area, Roadcap said, that could
affect wells that supply water to others.
“There’s quite a bit that needs to be considered,” Roadcap said.
The
city should also consider cooperating with water systems that have
excess capacity, LaForge wrote. Between the Edinburg, Dawson,
Taylorville, the South Sangamon Water Commission and other systems, the
region each day can produce as much as four million gallons more than is
needed, and Springfield would need just 10 miles of eightinch pipe to
tap in, LaForge says.
LaForge
also isn’t convinced that gravel pits near Riverton couldn’t be part of
the solution. According to a 2013 study commissioned by the city, the
pits could produce 1.6 million gallons of water per day – if more water
is taken, wells that supply the South Sangamon Water Commission,
Riverton and other communities might go dry. But LaForge said that no
one has studied whether there might be sufficient water for everyone if
wells for other municipal water systems were drilled deeper.
LaForge agrees that combining options is the best approach.
“We’ve
got all kinds of backup systems (in our recommendations),” Laforge
said. “They’ve got a dead lake. It’s just a good idea: Diversify.”
Meckes wrote in his email that the Corps of Engineers, which must grant a permit, will look at all options.
“In
the past when studied, some of these alternatives would be affected by
drought in a similar condition as Springfield, and other alternatives,
somewhat more drought tolerant, would not have the additional capacity
to supply CWLP the amount of water needed,” Meckes wrote.
Contact Bruce Rushton at [email protected].