District 186 is financially stable, but still hurting from past cuts
It’s only the fourth day of the school year in Springfield Public School District 186, but already Teresa Holton has her AP literature and composition students at Southeast High School reading Cormack McCarthy’s The Road, a challenging book in many ways. The students aren’t just reading the book; they’re dissecting its missing quotation marks, minimalist dialogue and jarring but deeply descriptive prose. The lack of chapters, Holton points out, gives the reader no convenient stopping point, which illustrates the endless struggles of the apocalyptic world McCarthy created.
As her class period draws to a close, she thumbs through the book to find an appropriate page number for the students to read by next week.
“100,” she announces. “Ha,” comes a loud guffaw from a student at the back of the room, as if Holton is joking. She gives the student “The Look” that all teachers eventually master.
“Oh.” Holton’s class is one of several Advanced Placement (AP) classes offered in District 186 high schools. The classes, which offer students a chance to earn college credit in calculus, physics, biology, government, history and other topics while still in high school, are optional for both students and the district itself. These engaging classes are also a testament to what District 186 has been able to do despite inadequate, erratic funding.
The district is regaining its footing after weathering a financial storm that began in 2010, thanks to the economic recession and the State of Illinois’ financial crisis. While the district’s outlook for now is stable, the cuts made in the past four years remain, and the district’s future is still subject to the everchanging winds of politics and economics.
There are plans in motion to mitigate that vulnerability, but immediate action seems unlikely.
Four years of cuts
In 2010, District 186 finances took a huge hit. The State of Illinois, going through its own financial crisis that continues to this day, cut funding for districts around the state through “proration,” a technical term for giving districts only a percentage of what the Illinois State Board of Education recommends. For Springfield, that meant getting only 89 percent of what the state had promised. Joe Bascio (pronounced like the end of Tabasco) calculated that over the past five years, Springfield Public Schools has been “prorated” out of nearly $19 million in state funding. Bascio, who has worked for Springfield Public Schools for 29 years and spent the last three as business manager, says for fiscal year 2016, the district expects to be shorted $3.1 million.
While the state was stiffing schools, the economic recession was drastically devaluing the investments held by District 186, wiping out about $4.6 million of the district’s investment income from calendar year 2008 ($11.5 million) to 2009 ($6.9 million). Investment income for District 186 still hasn’t recovered, with about $7.8 million projected for Fiscal Year 2016.
Scott McFarland was on the Springfield Public Schools Board of Education in 2010 when the district’s revenue collapsed. He’s now the chairman of Invest in 186, a community group focused on supporting the district through funding advocacy and volunteerism. McFarland says the depth of cuts required to balance the budget in 2010 would have devastated the district, so the board decided to spread the cuts out over four years.
That meant laying off support staff, eliminating full-time librarians at elementary schools, allowing the
number of teachers to decrease through attrition, not updating
technology and equipment, reducing teaching hours, trimming elective
courses and more. In 2013, the district closed Wanless and Pleasant Hill
elementary schools, as well as the Capital College Preparatory Academy,
an alternative middle school for students interested in studying
science, technology, engineering and mathematics in college.
“People
assume the district has plenty of money and is spending more than it
should,” McFarland said. “I can tell you from poring over that budget
for four years, that’s not the case.”
School funding primer
Education funding in Illinois is complex.
School
districts in Illinois receive revenue from several sources, including
federal and state money, local property and sales taxes, and grants from
various levels of government. Many districts, Springfield included,
also have investments that provide some revenue. The state pays schools a
per student “foundation level” each year and provides “supplemental
state aid” to help districts with large proportions of lowincome
students.
The state’s
contribution makes up only about 29 percent of Springfield Public
Schools’ revenue each year, which means local property taxes fill most
of the remaining budget gap. (Federal funding provides about 13
percent.)
Each year, a
school district can increase the tax rate on property by up to five
percent (not five percentage points) or the rate of inflation, whichever
is less. The rate of inflation for last year was 1.5 percent, but Joe
Bascio says the district also receives a boost from any new properties
that are taxed for the first time, usually through new construction.
Effectively, the 2014 property tax rate (payable in 2015) for District
186 rose 2.92 percent over the previous year, from 5.0184 percent in
2013 to 5.1650 percent in 2014.
In
order to raise the tax rate more than five percent in a year, the
district must ask voter approval through a ballot referendum.School districts can also ask voters for a 1 percent sales tax increase,
but that money can only be used for building construction or
maintenance, and the last attempt to pass such an increase in 2010
failed 56 percent to 44 percent. The last time voters in Sangamon County
approved a referendum for District 186 was 31 years ago in 1984.
Preventing
another crisis Jennifer Gill took over as Springfield Public Schools
superintendent in January 2014, at the tail end of the district’s budget
cuts. A Springfield native educated at District 186, Gill has worked
for the district in a variety of roles. She says the district has run
balanced budgets the past two years due to cuts.
“We
know that living fiscally lean is an important part of what we do right
now, to maintain that balanced budget,” she said. “We have a goal to be
always balanced and not spend beyond our means, even when those means
have been significantly diminished. We understand that and we’re living
within our means.”
Asked whether the district’s finances are stable, Gill says yes. Asked whether they’re adequate, she chuckles.
“No, we don’t feel like we’re adequately funded,” she said.
The
cuts made over the past five years have left the district with aging
equipment, buildings in need of maintenance, fewer teachers and fewer
resources for important functions like helping homeless students or
tutoring those who fall behind. The district is able to offer free
breakfast and lunch to students in need, but only because of federal
funding.
“What we want
is the full adequacy that’s in the state (funding) formula,” Gill says.
“That or a rethinking of how they’re funding state education.”
For
two years, Sen. Andy Manar, D-Bunker Hill, has sponsored legislation in
the General Assembly to make the state’s education funding formula more
equitable. Currently, the formula does very little to account for the
wide funding disparity between school districts with strong property tax
bases and those without, many of which are in rural areas or inner
cities. For example, Jennifer Gill says Springfield is unique in that
roughly 40 percent of the properties in District 186 don’t pay property
tax, because they belong to the state, a religious group or another
taxexempt organization.
Manar’s
current bill, Senate Bill 316, lost a vote in the Senate after every
Republican and a handful of politically vulnerable Democrats voted
“present.” In addition to changing the education funding formula, the
bill would have frozen property taxes for two years and would have
provided money to Chicago Public Schools to make a pension payment. The
bill’s defeat was largely due to the ongoing budget feud between the
Republican Rauner administration and the Democrat-controlled
legislature.
Absent
any action from the state to fully fund schools or change the school
funding formula, District 186 could find future stability in asking the
public for more local property tax money through a referendum. However,
both Jennifer Gill at District 186 and school board president Mike
Zimmers say they’re not pushing for a referendum right now. Zimmers says
he supports Manar’s legislation.
Scott
McFarland at Invest in 186 says he doesn’t have much hope for a
referendum right now, either. McFarland notes that voters in Decatur
approved a school funding referendum the same night in 2010 that voters
in Sangamon County rejected one. He said the difference is that
organizers in Decatur had been building support for years. For now,
McFarland is hoping for Manar’s bill to eventually pass.
“As long as you rely on property taxes to fund the bulk of education,” he said, “there are always going be haves and have-nots.”
Although
voters in Sangamon County didn’t approve the one-percent sales tax
referendum in 2010, a statewide advisory referendum on taxing the
wealthy for education passed with strong support here in 2014. More than
62 percent of Sangamon County voters support implementing a
three-percent tax on individual income over $1 million, with the
proceeds going toward education. The nonbinding referendum received 63
percent support state about Springfield Public Schools: salaries are too
high, there are too many middle managers, and the high schools are
dirty and unsafe.
Data
from the Illinois State Board of Education shows that average salaries
are lower in Springfield than the state at large. The average teacher
salary in District 186 was $56,468 in 2014, compared with the state
average of $62,435. Administrators in District 186 make an average of
$93,508, compared with $101,096 statewide.
The
same data does show that District 186 spent slightly more of its budget
on administration in 2013 – 5.3 percent in Springfield versus 3.3
percent statewide. However, Gill says the size and diversity of
Springfield Public Schools requires a robust administrative team to run
the district’s many programs. She also says the number of middle
management positions has been reduced over the past four years.
“Come
work in a school for a day,” Gill says. “They’ll enjoy and appreciate
the middle manager when they’re having trouble. … We don’t hire people
that are just sitting around.”
As
for the district’s safety, Diamond Jackson, a 17-year-old senior at
Southeast High School, says she feels safe at school. Jackson, the
student member of the District 186 school board, points out the on-duty
police providing security in the halls as she walks to her Advanced
Placement psychology class. A song playing over the school’s speaker
system warns students that only 30 seconds remain until they are tardy.
The halls, which appear well-kept and free of trash, empty quickly as
students scurry to class. Jackson’s psychology textbook is from 2007.
She says most of her books are around the same age.
Jackson
is a first-degree black belt in karate and a member of the National
Honor Society. Her class schedule looks like a college course catalog:
literature and composition, psychology, zoology of invertebrates and so
on. She plans to attend college for dentistry, with a specialization in
Spanish-speaking communities. She is organized, punctual, respectful and
clearly college-ready. But what about her fellow seniors? Jackson
estimates that three-fourths of them plan to attend college, and most of
them are ready academically.
What
effect the negative perceptions of Springfield Public Schools have on
the public’s willingness to support the district through a local funding
increase or other means is up for debate, but they likely don’t help.
Regardless, McFarland says something needs to change.
“In
the long term, we’re going to run into the same ebb and flow, where if
we have another economic downturn, you’ll have to make the same cuts,
except this time, they’re going to have to cut even deeper because we
were never able to restore the cuts we made last time,” he said.
Asked
why people without children or whose children are already grown should
care about how the school district fares, McFarland says the success of
District 186 is tied to the success of the city as a whole.
“I
truly believe the district is the best resource Springfield has to
prosper,” he said. “In order for the city to grow and be a place people
want to live, we need to support our schools.”
Contact Patrick Yeagle at [email protected].